Lett v. Paymentech, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
JENKINS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Before the Court are defendant Pay-mentech’s motion for partial judgment on the pleadings (Féd.R.Civ.P.12(c)), and motion to dismiss the fifth cause of action (Fed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(6)). Paymentech challenges the constitutionality of two sections of the California Labor Code asserted against it by Valerie Lett (“Lett”), which pertain to companies without a permanent and fixed place of business within the State of California. For the reasons outlined…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re the Appeals of CIG Field Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- In Re the Appeals of CIG Field Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- Lopez v. Smiths Detection, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Sorokunov v. NetApp, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2026