Legal Opinion

Winfree v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 13, 1953No. 48730PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, Judge

Plaintiff, a Colonel in the regular army, brings this action to recover the difference in pay between that actually received by him as a retired officer and that which he would have received had he remained on active duty for the period between February 1,1942, and November 30,1943.

There are two principal questions which we are called upon to decide. First, whether plaintiff’s retirement orders were effectively revoked; second, if not, whether plaintiff on January 31, 1942, had the requisite service for retirement under Section 1 of the Act of June 30,1882,22 Stat. 117.

This section of the Act…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. United States v. NoceSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. United States v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Hartigan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Odell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  3. Gerber v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  4. Betty Friedman, of the Estate of Joseph Friedman, Deceased v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Bylund v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API