Legal Opinion

Bylund v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 20, 1983No. 278-81CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

OPINION

YOCK, Judge:

In this military pay case, Orvil Wayne Bylund (plaintiff) instituted this action to obtain additional compensation in connection with his successful request for an early discharge due to hardship.

In the present case, plaintiff was accepted into the United States Navy on September 22, 1941, for a six-year tour of duty to expire on September 22, 1947. On July 15, 1946, he underwent a physical examination for separation pursuant to his request for an early discharge and was found physically qualified for separation. However, later that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kirby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  3. Brundage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  4. Charles H. Debow, Jr. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. Feldman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hannon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API