Legal Opinion

Wescott v. Wood

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1922No. 17422PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

— Suit for damages on account of alleged fraudulent representations. The defendants have appealed from a judgment against them based upon the jury’s verdict.

The appellants’ claim of error because of the overruling of their demurrer to the complaint can be best presented following a discussion of their claim that the court erred in not granting a nonsuit, in not granting judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and in refusing a new trial.

The respondent’s testimony shows the following facts: In July, 1921, appellant H. H. Wood received a two-year lease from the owner of a tract of land 120 feet…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wooddy v. Benton Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Zimmern v. BlountCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917
  3. Curtley v. Security Savings SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Christensen v. KochWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Raser v. MoomawWashington Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ehlinger v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  2. Rummer v. ThroopWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Wimmer v. ParsonsWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Johnson v. Shell Oil Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API