Legal Opinion

People v. Sharpe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendants’ speedy trial rights pursuant to CPL 30.30 were not violated by preindictment delay, because the record clearly establishes that each defendant requested delay in presentment of various drug charges in *997hopes of negotiating a more favorable plea than would have been legally possible after indictment (People v Thill, 75 AD2d 709, revd on other grounds 52 NY2d 1020; People v Fuentes, 115 AD2d 351). Each proceeding commenced on September 25, 1981. Readiness was not announced until August 4, 1982. The record establishes excludable time in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ThillNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. ThillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. People v. FuentesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. HudsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. People v. WolfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API