Legal Opinion
People v. Hudson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 16, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the hearing court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he had been denied his statutory right to a speedy trial (CPL 30.30, 210.20). We disagree. The court properly excluded from the statutory six-month time period (CPL 30.30 [1] [a]) delays consented to or requested by defendant to attempt to negotiate a favorable plea bargain and to testify before the Grand Jury (see generally, People v Sharpe, 115 AD2d 996, lv denied 67 NY2d 889; People v Wolf, 115 AD2d 997, lv denied 67 NY2d 892). Also…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- 71 Fifth Avenue Co. v. City of New York Department of FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. BrazeauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- MW Zack Metal Co. v. INT'L NAVIGATION CORP. OF MONROVIANew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. WojciechowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. LissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. WaldronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991