People v. Thill
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the case remitted to that court for a review of the facts.
By pleading guilty, defendant waived his statutory right to assert that he was entitled to dismissal because the People were not ready for trial within the time required by CPL 30.30. (See People v Clary, 52 NY2d 1023 [decided herewith] ; People v Friscia, 51 NY2d 845.) He cannot, therefore, test the validity of that claim on appeal.
*1022We reject defendant’s argument that the due process clauses of the Federal and State Constitutions require a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. FrisciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. ClaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. KoniecznyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. PrescottNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. SobotkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. DicksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.