Legal Opinion

Schaub v. ARC Welding Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Lillibridge, J. Assumpsit by Julius W. Schaub against the Arc Welding Company for the breach of a contract of employment. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.

This is an action of assumpsit, brought to recover damages for an alleged breach of a written contract of employment, which is set forth in full in the declaration. The contract of employment, which is dated September 7, 1897, was entered into between the defendant, a Michigan corporation, and another corporation, as employers, and plaintiff as employé, and was for the employment of the plaintiff for a period of three years from September 1, 1897, as the “general superintendent” of the employing companies, at a compensation of $2,500 for the first year, $3,750 for the second, and $5,000 for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Park Bros. & Co. v. BushnellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1894
  2. Shaver v. InghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Degen v. Manistee, Filer City & East Lake Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Vincent v. SherwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Schaub v. Welded-Barrel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Schaub v. CoffinMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API