Schaub v. Coffin
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Hosmer, J. Creditor’s bill by Julius W. Schaub against Charles L. ■Coffin and Cyrus E. Lothrop, impleaded with the Welded-Barrel Company. Prom a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
In September, 1897, there were two corporations doing business in Detroit, one called “The Arc Welding Company,” the other “ The Welded-Steel Barrel Company.” One Coffin was a member of both companies.. The latter company was engaged in making welded steel barrels under patents obtained by Coffin, and at that time held by the Arc Welding Company, which was a company organized to hold and control similar patents, a large number of which had been issued upon Coffin’s inventions. The Welded-Steel Barrel Company appears to have owned no patent, but was operating under some sort of a license from…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schaub v. ARC Welding Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Schaub v. Welded-Barrel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by1 opinion
- Crouch v. GrayTennessee Supreme Court · 1926