Legal Opinion

Schaub v. Welded-Barrel Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne; Erazer, J. Assumpsit by Julius W. Schaub against the Welded-Barrel Company for the breach of a contract of employment. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendant for the breach of. a contract which he entered into with the defendant and with the Arc Welding Company. He also sued the last-named company for a breach of the same contract, and obtained a judgment, which judgment was affirmed in Schaub v. Arc Welding Co., 123 *593Mich. 487 (82 N. W. 235). A reference to that case will aid in arriving at an understanding of this case. Mr. Coffin was a stockholder, director, and president of the defendant company, as well as of the Arc Welding Company. Mr. Lothrop was also a stockholder, director, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hatch v. SquiresMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Three Rivers National Bank v. GilchristMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hodges v. Detroit Electric Light & Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Schaub v. ARC Welding Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Swanstrom v. Muskegon Improvement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Schaub v. CoffinMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Schaub v. Welded-Barrel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API