Legal Opinion

D'Allessandro v. Durham Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 1983No. 10 E.D. Appeal Docket 1982PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

The sole issue presented is whether an insurance company is barred from using false statements in an application for life insurance to defend against a claim under the insurance policy where the policy provides that such a statement may not be used to contest a claim “unless a copy of the instrument containing the statement has been furnished to the person making the claim” and the insurance company furnished a copy of the application to the claimant only after the named insured’s death. The lower courts held the failure of the insurance company to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. College Watercolor Group, Inc. v. William H. Newbauer, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Ehrlich v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Topkis v. RosenzweigSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Layman v. Continental Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. D'Allessandro v. Durham Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance v. Insurance CommissionerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Musisko v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Amatex Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (In Re Amatex Corp.)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Winters v. Erie Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Koenig v. Progressive InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API