Legal Opinion

Topkis v. Rosenzweig

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 1938No. Appeal, 362PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Barnes,

The one question here presented is whether a policy of liability insurance upon a rented automobile, by an exception clause, excludes from its coverage the liability of the driver for injuries sustained by a third person while riding therein.

On March 18, 1930, the defendant rented an automobile from Hertz Driv-Ur-Self Company, which was covered by a certain policy of liability insurance then in force, issued by the garnishee, Continental Casualty Company, for the protection of the Hertz company and all bailees renting cars from it. The policy, which insured…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Urian v. Scranton Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Hesse v. Traveler's Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Bole v. New Hampshire Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Skelly v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Levinton v. Ohio Farmers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Aetna Casualty & Surety InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Hagarty v. Wm. Akers, Jr., Co., Inc.Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Patton v. PattonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. International Derrick & Equipment Co. v. BuxbaumCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  5. D'Allessandro v. Durham Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API