Legal Opinion

Koenig v. Progressive Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 26, 1991No. 00593PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

Two issues are presented before us on appeal, one of contract interpretation and one of statutory interpretation. The first issue we must address is whether under an automobile insurance policy providing “per person” coverage for bodily injury as well as a higher “per accident” liability limit, an insurer that has exhausted its “per person” liability to a person sustaining bodily injury in an automobile accident is obligated to make additional payments within the “per accident” limit for loss of consortium by the victim’s spouse. The second issue we must address, assuming we…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Collister v. Nationwide Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Mohn v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Aetna Casualty & Surety InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Tomlinson v. SkolnikOhio Supreme Court · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. CorbettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Bowersox v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Jackson v. Travelers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Fanelle v. LoJack Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. RidderDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API