Robinson v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
TOM G. DAVIS, Justice (Retired).
After finding appellant guilty of the offense of murder, Tex. Penal Code Ann. 19.02(b)(2) (West 1994), the jury assessed punishment at confinement for forty years. Appellant asserts five points of error, contending the trial court erred because: (1) Section 19.02 of the Texas Penal Code violates the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution; (2) Section 19.02 violates the due course of law provision of the Texas Constitution; (3) Section 19.02 violates the open courts provision of the Texas constitution; (4) the evidence is insufficient to support…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Noland v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
- Harrell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Vasquez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- Rainey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Fleming v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.