Legal Opinion

Noland v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided October 1, 2008No. 01-06-00829-CRPublishedCited by 265 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TERRY JENNINGS, Justice.

A jury found appellant, Brent Noland, guilty of the offense of murder 1 and assessed his punishment at confinement for fifty-five years and a $10,000 fine. In four points of error, appellant contends that (1) the evidence is factually insufficient to support the jury’s finding that he was not under the immediate influence of sudden passion arising from an adequate cause at the time of the offense, (2) his punishment is excessive under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution, 2 (3) the trial court erred in denying his motion for new trial without a…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Zuliani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  5. Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by265 opinions

  1. Kim v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  3. Russell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  4. Rigoberto Pantoja v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. Diamond v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012

260 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API