Legal Opinion

State v. Acrey

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 13, 2006No. 56759-4-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.

¶1 Sonia Acrey drained the retirement savings of an elderly man and accumulated more than $83,000 of debt in his name. She pleaded guilty to theft, identity theft, and perjury. As part of her sentence, the judge prohibited her from working as a caretaker for elderly or disabled individuals. Acrey contends the court was without authority to impose the prohibition and that the prohibition was not crime-related and was unconstitutionally vague. We hold that RCW 9.94A.505(8) authorizes judges to impose crime-related prohibitions as part of any sentence and that the prohibition in Acrey’s sentence…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. RileyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. RilesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re the Personal Restraint of CarleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. United States v. Stan SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Department of Transportation v. State Employees' Insurance BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. ButtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API