Legal Opinion

United States v. Stan Smith

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 16, 1991No. 90-2017PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRORBY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant Stan Smith appeals the sentence imposed by the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico upon our vacation of his previous sentence and remand for resentencing in United States v. Smith, 888 F.2d 720 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1786, 108 L.Ed.2d 788 (1990). Because the new sentence was imposed as a result of an incorrect application of the sentencing guidelines, we vacate the sentence and remand the case for resentenc-ing.

A brief recap of the events to date is useful to an understanding of the dispute. On March…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. Gregory J. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Stan SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Kelvin Treavaughn DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. United States v. Ernesto Quintieri, Carlo DonatoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. James F. MooredCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. George Robert BellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Joe Luis SaucedoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. James E. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API