Verizon California Inc. v. Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
This is a property tax refund action for the 2007 tax year filed by plaintiff, Verizon California Inc. (Verizon). The trial court entered a judgment of dismissal after it sustained defendants’ demurrer without leave to amend. Defendants are the Board of Equalization (Board) and nine individual counties. Verizon owns property in 38 counties, but it sought a refund for taxes paid for the 2007 tax year only from the nine named counties. The trial court sustained the demurrer on the ground Verizon failed to name indispensable parties, i.e., the 29 absent counties in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Haraguchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Brosterhous v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- ITT World Communications, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Hilaly v. AllenCalifornia Superior Court · 2019
- Hilaly v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Sprint Telephony v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Sprint Telephony v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.