Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2012No. S188619PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

Defendants in criminal cases have a federal constitutional right to represent themselves. (Faretta v. California (1975) 422 U.S. 806 [45 L.Ed.2d 562, 95 S.Ct. 2525] (Faretta).) In Indiana v. Edwards (2008) 554 U.S. 164 [171 L.Ed.2d 345, 128 S.Ct. 2379] (Edwards), however, the United States Supreme Court held that states may, but need not, deny self-representation to defendants who, although competent to stand trial, lack the mental health or capacity to represent themselves at trial—persons the court referred to as “gray-area defendants.” (Id. at p. 174.) We must decide whether…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. People v. LightseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. BoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Riverside County Sheriff's Department v. StiglitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API