People v. Johnson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
Defendants in criminal cases have a federal constitutional right to represent themselves. (Faretta v. California (1975) 422 U.S. 806 [45 L.Ed.2d 562, 95 S.Ct. 2525] (Faretta).) In Indiana v. Edwards (2008) 554 U.S. 164 [171 L.Ed.2d 345, 128 S.Ct. 2379] (Edwards), however, the United States Supreme Court held that states may, but need not, deny self-representation to defendants who, although competent to stand trial, lack the mental health or capacity to represent themselves at trial—persons the court referred to as “gray-area defendants.” (Id. at p. 174.) We must decide whether…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- People v. LightseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. BoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Riverside County Sheriff's Department v. StiglitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.