Legal Opinion
Delancey v. City of Austin
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 3, 2009No. 08-50934PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENNIS, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-Appellants Curtis L. Delancey and Marian D. Delancey (“Plaintiffs”) sued Defendant-Appellee the City of Austin (“the City”) seeking monetary damages under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policy Act (“URA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4601 et seq. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the City, holding that the URA does not provide a private right of action for monetary damages. We AFFIRM for essentially the reasons stated by the district court.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiffs owned a parcel of land located at 5106…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kellie Stokes v. Southwest AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Clear Sky Car Wash, LLC v. City of ChesapeakeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- Rollock Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Texas Health & Human Services Commission v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2016
- Jensen Field Relocation Claims Jensen Field, Inc. v. Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.