Legal Opinion
International Business Machines Corp. v. Murphy & O'Connell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 2, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered March 28, 1990, which denied defendant’s motion for an order vacating a default judgment entered on September 21, 1989 against it in the total sum of $29,116.73, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff commenced this action to recover amounts allegedly owed it by the defendant law firm under a lease arrangement for a photocopying machine. The action was commenced by service of a summons with notice on the defendant.
In response to the summons with notice, defendant did not serve a demand for a complaint as required…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boorman v. DeutschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Quantum Heating Services Inc. v. AusternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Bloom v. KernanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- DeAngelis v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- De Angelis v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by4 opinions
- International Business Machines Corp. v. Murphy & O'ConnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- McCray v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002