Legal Opinion
United States v. Richardson
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided August 30, 2005No. 04-1617PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Joanne Richardson appeals her conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1623 for making false statements during immunized testimony before a grand jury investigating allegations of Medicare/Medicaid fraud. Richardson first contends that the district court erroneously denied her motion to dismiss the indictment because her trial took place after the deadline imposed by the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1361-74 (“STA”). Next, Richardson asserts that at least one of the nineteen false statements charged against her in a single count of perjury advances a theory of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pasquantino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. Hector M. Rodriguez-EstradaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Wbip, LLC v. Kohler Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- McDonough v. City of QuincyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- United States v. James BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- United States v. FoleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.