Legal Opinion

McDonough v. City of Quincy

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 23, 2006No. 04-1902, 04-1969PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Circuit Judge.

A jury sitting in the District of Massachusetts found that the City of Quincy, Massachusetts, violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., and Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 151B, by unlawfully retaliating against police officer John McDonough for assisting a fellow officer in pursuing an employment discrimination claim. The jury awarded McDon-ough $300,000 in compensatory damages. The parties cross-appealed. The City challenges the verdict on several grounds, including that the action was barred by the claim preclusion doctrine and that the evidence…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Dávila v. Corporación De Puerto Rico Para La Difusión PúblicaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  2. Giragosian v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  3. Chuan Wang v. PalmisanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  4. Tobin v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  5. Rodriguez-Garcia v. Miranda-MarinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API