Legal Opinion
Sharpensteen v. Hughes
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 1958No. Civ. 5833PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
As a result of a claim and delivery action filed by plaintiff-respondent against defendant-appellant Herbert Hughes, individually and as sheriff of Imperial County, the trial court ordered the return to plaintiff of four so-called coin-operated pinball machines (Exhibits G, H, K and L) and their contents, gave judgment for damages for retention for $576, and ordered defendant to pay his costs of suit. From this portion of the judgment and order defendant appeals. It was further ordered that four other machines (Exhibits E, F, I and J) be confiscated and destroyed under sections 330b and 330.1…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- People v. RalphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- City of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Bacon Service Corporation v. Huss.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Old Homestead Bakery, Inc. v. MarshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. Justice CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Walsh v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Merandette v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Trinkle v. StrohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Peck's Liquors, Inc. v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.