Legal Opinion
Trinkle v. Stroh
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 18, 1997No. C024840PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, Acting P. J.
In this appeal seeking recovery of six machines seized as illegal gaming devices, plaintiffs John Trinkle, individually and doing business as Galaxy Vending Company, and Jim Nichols, individually and doing business as Stockton Music Company, appeal from a judgment entered in favor of Jay R. Stroh, as Director of Alcoholic Beverage Control, and Alcoholic Beverage Control (hereafter collectively ABC). Plaintiffs contend the machines were not illegal gaming devices, and the pertinent Penal Code provisions are unconstitutionally vague. (Undesignated statutory references…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bowland v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Cranston v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- California Gasoline Retailers v. Regal Petroleum Corp. of Fresno, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re Marriage of NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Trinkle v. California State LotteryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People Ex Rel. Green v. GrewalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Mason v. Machine Zone, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Pacific Gaming TechnologiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.