Legal Opinion
Voege v. Ackerman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 1976No. 70 Civil 5776PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
This application for allowance of counsel fees was deferred pending the filing and allowance of claims by shareholders on whose behalf the action was commenced. Familiarity is assumed with the terms of the settlement, which were approved by this court after due notice to interested parties.1 The gross amount of the settlement fund represented $0.27 per outstanding Armour share as of the date of the Greyhound-Armour merger. However, this was subject to deductions for legal fees and administrative expenses, so that the maximum amount of settlement was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Blank v. Talley Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Levin v. Mississippi River CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Voege v. AckermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,720 William R. Van Gemert v. The Boeing Company (Formerly the Boeing Airplane Company)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Knutson v. Daily Review, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1979
- Clement v. American Honda Finance Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- Williamson v. John D. Quinn Construction Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Duhaime v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.