Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. City of Town and Country

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1992No. 59436PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Judge.

This is a declaratory judgment action in which plaintiffs, partners in Centre Park Forty Associates (CP40), challenge the reasonableness of the residential zoning of their property located on the north outer road of Highway 40, in the defendant city, Town and Country. The trial court found the residential zoning to be unconstitutionally unreasonable. Town and Country appeals. We affirm.

Scope of Review

At the outset, the parties disagree about the scope of our review. Town and Country argues that we must review de novo the evidence adduced at trial, and, in turn, it also contends…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Huttig v. City of Richmond HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Boswell v. Steel Haulers, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Binger v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  5. Vatterott v. City of FlorissantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Meramec Valley R-III School District v. City of EurekaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. State v. KhoshabaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State Ex Rel. Helujon, Ltd. v. Jefferson CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Heidrich v. City of Lee's SummitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Great Rivers Habitat Alliance v. City of St. PetersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API