Vatterott v. City of Florissant

HIGGINS, Commissioner.

Appeal from judgment that Ordinance 1625, the “zoning ordinance” of the City of Florissant, is confiscatory and void as applied to a certain tract owned by plaintiff-respondent. The action involves constitutionality of the ordinance in question, Marshall v. Kansas City, Mo., 355 S.W.2d 877, 879[1]; and evidence shows that some $95,000 is also in controversy. Wrigley Properties, Inc. v. City of Ladue, Mo., 369 S.W.2d 397, 398 [ 1 ]; Huttig v. City of Richmond Heights, Mo., 372 S.W.2d 833, 834.

The property involved is the south 240 feet of Parcel B of Duchesne Hills, Plat…