Legal Opinion

State v. Khoshaba

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1994No. 62791, 64324PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant, Yeprem Khoshaba, was charged as a prior, persistent and class X offender by an amended information with second degree burglary of the home of Vito Palazolla at 3925 Pennsylvania in the City of St. Louis, in violation of § 569.170, RSMo 1986. He was found guilty by a jury in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis and was sentenced to twenty years. Subsequently, he filed a pro se Rule 29.15 motion and later an amended motion, which were denied without an evi-dentiary hearing.

On appeal, appellant claims that the motion court clearly erred by denying his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. State v. ErvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. State v. BradleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  5. State v. RoeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  2. State v. WoodsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State v. BradshawMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. State v. KenneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. AyersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API