Legal Opinion

City of Bismarck v. Santineau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1993No. Civ. 930175PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

Eugene Santineau appealed from a judgment of the district court vacating an administrative hearing officer’s order that the City of Bismarck employ Santineau under the state’s “veterans’ preference” statute, section 37-19.1-02, NDCC. We affirm.

Santineau, a veteran, was one of six applicants Bismarck examined, in an interview format, in October of 1992 for the position of Water Plant Operator I. The six applicants had been referred to Bismarck by Job Service of North Dakota, which had given the individuals an aptitude test and found each to possess the minimum…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Sloat v. Board of Examiners of the Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Almassy v. Los Angeles County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. McGowan v. BursteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State Ex Rel. Spaeth v. Eddy Furniture Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. One Black 1989 Cadillac VIN 1G6DW51Y8KR722027North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Wagner v. Sheridan County Social Services BoardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Black Hills Trucking, Inc. v. North Dakota Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Lippert v. Grand Forks Public School DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Black Hills Trucking, Inc. v. North Dakota Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API