McGowan v. Burstein
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Wachtler.
Article V, § 6 of our State Constitution requires that, as far *732as practicable, the merit and fitness of candidates for appointments and promotions in the civil service be ascertained by competitive examination. The primary question presented by this appeal is whether, consistent with this constitutional requirement, such examinations may be subject to zone scoring, a grading method which assigns a single grade to a range of raw scores. The letter grades A-F or a pass/fail grading system are familiar, but extreme, illustrations. A more subtle example is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- People Ex Rel. Schau v. . McWilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Grossman v. RankinNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Cassidy v. Municipal Civil Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Matter of Fink v. FineganNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- People v. StuartNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Caruso v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Kelly v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Cohen v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- In Re the Arbitration Between Professional, Clerical, Technical Employees Ass'n & Buffalo Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.