Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 21, 1986No. 13166-4-I; 15929-1-IPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
—These cases consolidated for purposes of review require determination of the extent of insurance coverage. In the first case, Daylette Rodriguez, age 15, through her guardian ad litem, brought an action against Darrell Williams, her stepfather, and American States Insurance Company for a declaratory judgment that the homeowner's insurance policy American States issued to Williams provides coverage for the damages caused by Williams's incestuous relationship with her. The trial court granted American States's motion for summary judgment of dismissal, and Rodriguez appeals.
The policy provides:
S…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Phil Schroeder, Inc. v. Royal Globe InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- CNA Insurance v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Patrons-Oxford Mutual Insurance v. DodgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Independent School District No. 656Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Allstate Insurance v. MugaveroNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Rodriguez v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Gearing v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.