Legal Opinion

Phil Schroeder, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1983No. 48699-9PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

Royal Globe Insurance Company (Royal Globe), defendant below, appealed the trial court's judgment for the replacement cost of a carpet in the amount of $8,337.90 plus interest of $1,127.37 plus a judgment for attorney fees under the provisions of Washington's Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86. We affirm the trial court, holding that an insurance policy issued to a carpet cleaning company, which contains an exclusion for damage to property "in the care, custody or control of the insured", covers the cost of replacement of wall-to-wall carpeting damaged as a result of the malfunctioning of a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Home Indemnity Co. v. Village of PlymouthOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Tyler v. Grange Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. Boswell v. Travelers Indemnity Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Murray v. MossmanWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. HaasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. KallevigWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API