Phil Schroeder, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.
Royal Globe Insurance Company (Royal Globe), defendant below, appealed the trial court's judgment for the replacement cost of a carpet in the amount of $8,337.90 plus interest of $1,127.37 plus a judgment for attorney fees under the provisions of Washington's Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86. We affirm the trial court, holding that an insurance policy issued to a carpet cleaning company, which contains an exclusion for damage to property "in the care, custody or control of the insured", covers the cost of replacement of wall-to-wall carpeting damaged as a result of the malfunctioning of a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Home Indemnity Co. v. Village of PlymouthOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Tyler v. Grange Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Boswell v. Travelers Indemnity Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Murray v. MossmanWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. HaasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. KallevigWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.