Legal Opinion

People v. Forgason

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1979No. Crim. 18759PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, Acting P. J.

Defendant Forgason was found guilty by a jury of voluntary manslaughter (Pen. Code, § 192, subd. 1); his wife, Barbara, was the victim. His appeal is from the judgment which was thereafter entered upon the jury’s verdict.

No contention is made that the evidence placed before the jury did not constitute substantial evidence supportive of their verdict. (See People v. Redmond, 71 Cal.2d 745, 755 [79 Cal.Rptr. 529, 457 P.2d 321].) Instead Forgason argues, in part, that testimony of two witnesses at his preliminary examination who were unavailable at the trial should…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Showalter v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. People v. EnriquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. SalasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. HugheyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. People v. HaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. People v. VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. People v. TrimbleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API