Legal Opinion

People v. Haney

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1984No. Crim. 44308PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, Acting P. J.

This appeal involves the proper interpretation of a 1981 amendment to Penal Code section 872. Subdivisions (b) and (c) of that statute allow the prosecutor, in certain instances, to use statements under penalty of perjury at the preliminary hearing, in lieu of the live testimony of a witness. However, subdivision (c) further provides: “If the defendant makes reasonable efforts to secure the attendance of the witness but is unsuccessful . . . the court shall grant a short continuance at the request of the defendant and shall require the prosecuting attorney to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Jennings v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. EnriquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Eleazer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Mills v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People v. McCaskeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Loney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API