Legal Opinion

State v. Brooks

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1981No. 16639PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

This is an appeal by defendants Cecil Earl Brooks and James Charles Edward Good from a jury conviction of aggravated assault. The victims were not present at the trial and defendants were found guilty principally upon the testimony of the victims which had been recorded at the preliminary hearing. Other corroborative evidence was adduced at the trial.

Defendants raise three issues: (1) whether the admission at the trial of the taped preliminary hearing testimony violated defendants’ right to confrontation of witnesses afforded by the U. S. and the Utah Constitutions; (2) whether…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. LaroccoUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Bott v. DeLandUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Barson v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1984

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API