Legal Opinion
Barbosa v. Target Mortgage Corp.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided June 24, 1997No. 94-1938-CIV-RYSKAMPPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RYSKAMP, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon defendant Princeton Financial Corporation’s (“Princeton”) Renewed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [DE 108], filed February 10, 1997. Plaintiffs have responded in opposition, and Princeton has replied. The instant motion requires the Court to determine whether Princeton, a residential mortgage lender, violated § 8 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), 12 U.S.C. § 2607, by paying to a mortgage broker a “yield spread differential” for closing a loan at…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kerby v. Mortgage Funding Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998
- Hastings v. Fidelity Mortgage Decisions Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Moses v. Citicorp Mortgage, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Dubose v. First Security Savings BankDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
- In re Old Kent Mortgage Co. Yield Spread Premium LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.