Legal Opinion

Wyrick v. Hoefle

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1959No. 9873PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN:

This is an action to quiet title to certain described land situated in Fallon County. The only issue is that pertaining to oil and gas rights. Plaintiffs eoncededly own the surface rights and a part of the'oil and gas rights.

Defendants who appeared in the action claim collectively one-half of the oil and gas rights. All defendants who appeared in the action trace their ownership or claim as successors to the rights of Azarias G. Vincelette, now deceased. Hence, the determinative question in the case is whether Azarias Vincelette owned any oil and gas rights after he and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marias River Syndicate v. Big West Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. R. M. Cobban Realty Co. v. DonlanMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Stokes v. TutvetMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hochsprung v. StevensonMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Musselshell Valley Farming & Livestock Co. v. CooleyMontana Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Billings v. OE Lee CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  2. City of Missoula v. RoseMontana Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Libby Placer Mining Co. v. Noranda Minerals Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Lien v. SimonsDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1981
  5. Sampson v. SnowMontana Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API