Lien v. Simons
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATTIN, Chief Judge.
The issue presented by the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment is whether a tax deed purporting to convey mineral rights is effective against a prior reservation of mineral rights by deed. Because it is well-settled in Montana that minerals in place may not be taxed, we conclude that the tax deed does not convey the mineral rights. The minerals thus belong to the defendants.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
On November 8, 1918, Walter and Hattie Simons, defendants’ predecessors in title, conveyed by deed certain property located in Richland County, Montana, to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Jenkins v. FrederickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. MjeldeMontana Supreme Court · 1913
- Rist v. Toole CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1945
- Ohio Oil Co. v. Wyoming AgencyWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. County of MusselshellMontana Supreme Court · 1917
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cornell University v. Rusk CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Lien v. SimonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Simons v. LienCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982