Legal Opinion
Fritz v. Wright
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 18, 2006No. 116 MAP 2005PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice BAER.
Appellant Gordon Fritz1 appeals from an order of the Superior Court reversing the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County denying a motion for a mistrial filed by Hazel Wright, Carolyn Temple, Bonnie Stuart, and Samuel Wright (Appellees). The issue before this Court is whether 42 Pa.C.S. § 5104(b) and Article I, Section 6, of the Pennsylvania Constitution require that the same ten jurors vote identically on each question listed on a special interrogatory verdict sheet to sustain a proper “verdict” in the case. For the reasons that follow, we hold that any ten…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Firing v. KephartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Smith v. Times Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Ramich v. Worker's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Gourley Ex Rel. Gourley v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- U.S. Bank, N.A. Ex Rel. Bank of America, N.A. v. PautenisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Bruckshaw v. Frankford Hospital of the PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Carrozza v. GreenbaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Donoughe v. Lincoln Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Stapas, J. v. Giant Eagle, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.