Legal Opinion

Carrozza v. Greenbaum

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 2007No. 33 EAP 2005, 34 EAP 2005, 35 EAP 2005, 36 EAP 2006PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

We granted allowance of appeal to consider a question of first impression arising under the Pennsylvania Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association Act (Act), Act of Dec. 12, 1994, P.L. 1005, No. 137 § 1, as amended, 40 P.S. §§ 991.1801-991.1820, which was enacted in furtherance of the following purposes:(1) To provide a means for the payment of covered claims under certain property and casualty insurance policies, to avoid excessive delay in the payment of such claims and to avoid financial loss to claimants or policyholders as a result of the insolvency of an…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Craley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Sands v. Pa. Ins. Guaranty Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Bell v. SlezakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Maloney v. VALLEY MEDICAL FACILITIES, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Warrantech Consumer Products Services, Inc. v. Reliance Insurance Co. in LiquidationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Straw, J. v. Fair, K. v. Pittsburgh LubesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Everhart v. PMA Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API