Legal Opinion
Gipromer v. SS TEMPO
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 16, 1980No. 79 Civ. 5409 (LFM)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacMAHON, Chief Judge.
Defendants Scheepvaart Bedrijf Tempo (“Bedrijf”) and Seatrade Groningen B.V. (“Seatrade”) move for dismissal of the complaint as against them for lack of personal jurisdiction, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2), Fed. R.Civ.P. Plaintiff cross-moves to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the District of Maine, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a) and 1406(a).
Plaintiff does not dispute that we lack personal jurisdiction over defendants Bedrijf and Seatrade in this admiralty or maritime claim 1 arising out of alleged damage to and shortage of cargo…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- James Corke v. Sameiet M. S. Song of Norway, Royal Caribbean Cruise Line A/s Royal Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc., and Per Oslebye, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Internatio-Rotterdam, Inc. v. ThomsenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- Harry Rich Corporation v. Curtiss-Wright CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Societe Commerciale De Transports Transatlantiques v. African MercuryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- POSVEN, C.A. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- In Re McDonnell-Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Daval Steel Products v. M v. Juraj DalmatinacDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Colon v. Gulf Trading Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1985
- Ingersoll Milling MacHine Co. v. J. E. Bernard & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.