Legal Opinion
Daval Steel Products v. M v. Juraj Dalmatinac
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 5, 1989No. 88 Civ. 4475 (JMC)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CANNELLA, District Judge:
Defendants’ cross-motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and insuffi cient service of process is granted. Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(2), 12(b)(5). Plaintiffs motion for an order compelling defendants to comply with its discovery requests is denied as moot. Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(d).
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Daval Steel Products commenced the instant admiralty action on June 27, 1988, against the vessel M.V. Ju-raj Dalmatinac, and her owners/operators, Europe-Overseas Steamship Lines N.V. [“Eurolines”], and S.P. Shipping Co., Ltd. [“S.P. Shipping”].…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cutco Industries, Inc. v. Dennis E. NaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Hoffritz for Cutlery, Inc. And Edwin Jay, Inc. v. Amajac, Ltd. And Jack E. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Lehigh Valley Industries, Inc., and Lehigh Colonial Corporation, Vsv. Norman Birenbaum, and David BirenbaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Soltex Polymer Corporation v. Fortex Industries, Inc. And Fortiflex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Howard v. Klynveld Peat Marwick GoerdelerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Hart Holding Co. v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1991
- Royalty Network Inc. v. Dishant. Com, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Ex Parte Troncalli Chrysler Plymouth DodgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte BufkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.