Legal Opinion

Ingersoll Milling MacHine Co. v. J. E. Bernard & Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 24, 1981No. 80 C 3576PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Plaintiff, Ingersoll Milling Machine Company (“Ingersoll”), brought this action against Taiwan International Line, Ltd. (“Taiwan”), J. E. Bernard & Co. (“Bernard”), and Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. seeking recovery for damage to one of its milling machines while on board the M/V Bodena, which was under charter to Taiwan at the time,' en route from New Orleans, Louisiana to Pusan, South Korea. The rights and liabilities of the parties are controlled by the Carriage of Goods By Sea Act, 46 U.S.C. §§ 1300-1315, and jurisdiction of this Court is…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. KVOS, Inc. v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Nelson v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Lakeside Bridge & Steel Co. v. Mountain State Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ingersoll Milling Machine Co. v. M/V BodenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Torco Oil Co. v. Innovative Thermal Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  3. Colon v. Gulf Trading Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1985
  4. Sportmart, Inc. v. FrischDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  5. American National Bank & Trust Co. v. Hamilton Industries International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API