Legal Opinion
Wendy Pauluk v. Glenn Savage
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 8, 2016No. 14-15027PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge MURGUIA
Dissent by Judge NOONAN
OPINION
W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
This appeal stems from the death of Daniel Pauluk, an employee of the Clark County Health District (“CCHD”) in Nevada. Pauluk’s widow and daughters sued the CCHD and two of its employees, Edward Wojeik and Glenn Savage, alleging that their exposure of Pauluk to a workplace environment infested with toxic mold caused his death, in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court denied summary judgment to Wojeik and Savage (collectively,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Plumhoff v. RickardSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Linda K. Wood v. Steven C. Ostrander Neil MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Juan Hernandez v. City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Jon Frudden v. Kayann PillingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Patricia Polanco v. Ralph DiazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Patrick Russell v. Jocelyn LumitapCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Hung Lam v. City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.