Legal Opinion
Patrick Russell v. Jocelyn Lumitap
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 13, 2022No. 18-55831PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PATRICK RUSSELL, individually, and No. 18-55831 as Personal Representative of the Estate of Patrick John Russell; D.C. No. LYNNE RUSSELL, individually, and 8:17-cv-00125- as Personal Representative of the JLS-DFM Estate of Patrick John Russell, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. JOCELYN LUMITAP, individually; PATTI TROUT, individually; MARIA TEOFILO, individually; THOMAS LE, individually, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kingsley v. HendricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Reichle v. HowardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Todd D'Braunstein v. ChpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- (PC) Anderson v. VangerwenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- (PC) Coleman v. California Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (PC) Harding v. Correctional Health ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (PC) Hasbrook v. AdreanaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.