Legal Opinion

Plumhoff v. Rickard

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 27, 2014No. 12-1117PublishedCited by 1,573 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alito

*

*768 The courts below denied qualified immunity for police officers who shot the driver of a fleeing vehicle to put an end to a *2017 dangerous car chase. We reverse and hold that the officers did not violate the Fourth Amendment. In the alternative, we conclude that the officers were entitled to qualified immunity because they violated no clearly established law.

I

A

Because this case arises from the denial of the officers' motion for summary judgment, we view the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, the daughter of the driver who attempted to flee. Wilkie v . Robbins, 551 U.S. 537…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,573 opinions

  1. Mullenix v. LunaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Christopher J. Weiland v. Palm Beach County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  3. White v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Kisela v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. City and County of San Francisco v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

1,568 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API