Legal Opinion
United States v. Blue Chip Stamp Company
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 18, 1967No. 63-1552PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION DENYING MOTIONS TO INTERVENE AND TO VACATE CONSENT DECREE
FERGUSON, District Judge.
On June 5, 1967, the court approved and signed a consent decree in this antitrust action. Subsequent thereto Petitioners for Intervention filed motions which seek—(a) to intervene as a matter of right under Rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;(b) to be permitted to intervene under Rule 24(b); and(c) to vacate the consent decree of June 5, 1967.
At the conclusion of argument on July 81, 1967, the court orally announced its decision, and by minute order denied the motions. This opinion is…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Sam Fox Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Smuck v. HobsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Carl C. Smuck, a Member of the Board of Education of the District of Columbia v. Julius W. Hobson, Carl F. Hansen, Superintendent of Schools of the District of Columbia v. Julius W. HobsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.