Legal Opinion
G. v. Hawaii, Dept. of Human Services
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided June 14, 2010No. Civ. 08-00551 ACK-BMK, 09-00044 ACK-BMKPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART, AND DENYING IN PART, EVERCARE’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND THE JOINDERS THEREIN, AS TO PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS THAT THE QExA PROVIDER NETWORKS ARE INADEQUATE
ALAN C. KAY, Senior District Judge.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
I. Prior Proceedings
On December 8, 2008, in Civil No. 08-00551 ACK-BMK, Plaintiffs filed a complaint against Defendants the State of Hawaii, Department of Human Services (“State DHS”), and Lillian B. Roller, in her official capacity as the Director of the State DHS (collectively, “State Defen dants” or “State”). At that point, the Plaintiffs were…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- G. Ex Rel. K. v. HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011