Legal Opinion

G. Ex Rel. K. v. Hawaii

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided January 21, 2011No. Civ. 08-00551 ACK-BMK, 09-00044 ACK-BMKPublished

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND DECISION

ALAN C. KAY, Senior District Judge.

SYNOPSIS

This litigation involves a dispute over the method by which the State of Hawai’i is currently providing Medicaid services to aged, blind, and disabled beneficiaries (“ABD beneficiaries”). Traditionally, states provided Medicaid benefits on a fee-for-service basis (“Medicaid FFS”). In a Medicaid FFS program, the state contracts directly with and pays healthcare providers, such as physicians, hospitals, and clinics, for services they provide to Medicaid beneficiaries. By contrast, under a managed care…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API